🔗 Share this article

The composer Avril Coleridge-Taylor constantly felt the pressure of her parent’s heritage. As the offspring of the renowned Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, among the best-known English composers of the turn of the 20th century, her identity was shrouded in the deep shadows of history.

An Inaugural Recording

Earlier this year, I sat with these memories as I prepared to make the inaugural album of her concerto for piano composed in 1936. Boasting intense musical themes, expressive melodies, and confident beats, this piece will provide audiences valuable perspective into how this artist – an artist in conflict who entered the world in 1903 – conceived of her existence as a artist with mixed heritage.

Shadows and Truth

However about legacies. It can take a while to adjust, to see shapes as they truly exist, to distinguish truth from distortion, and I felt hesitant to confront Avril’s past for a while.

I had so wanted Avril to be a reflection of her father. Partially, that held. The pastoral English palettes of Samuel’s influence can be observed in many of her works, such as From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). However, one need only examine the titles of her father’s compositions to understand how he heard himself as both a champion of British Romantic style and also a advocate of the African heritage.

It was here that Samuel and Avril began to differ.

American society evaluated Samuel by the brilliance of his compositions instead of the his racial background.

Parental Heritage

During his studies at the prestigious music college, Samuel – the child of a Sierra Leonean father and a British mother – began embracing his heritage. Once the poet of color this literary figure visited the UK in the late 19th century, the young musician was keen to meet him. He adapted Dunbar’s African Romances into music and the subsequent year used the poet’s words for an opera, Dream Lovers. Subsequently arrived the choral piece that established his reputation: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Drawing from this American writer’s The Song of Hiawatha, Samuel’s Hiawatha was an international hit, notably for Black Americans who felt indirect honor as American society evaluated the composer by the brilliance of his music instead of the his background.

Advocacy and Beliefs

Recognition did not reduce his beliefs. In 1900, he was present at the initial Pan African gathering in London where he encountered the African American intellectual the renowned Du Bois and saw a variety of discussions, such as the subjugation of Black South Africans. He was a campaigner throughout his life. He kept connections with trailblazers for equality like this intellectual and this leader, gave addresses on ending discrimination, and even talked about issues of racism with President Theodore Roosevelt while visiting to the White House in 1904. As for his music, the scholar reflected, “he made his mark so prominently as a musician that it cannot soon be forgotten.” He passed away in 1912, in his thirties. But what would the composer have reacted to his child’s choice to work in the African nation in the that decade?

Issues and Stance

“Child of Celebrated Artist shows support to apartheid system,” appeared as a heading in the community journal Jet magazine. This policy “appeared to me the right policy”, she informed Jet. Upon further questioning, she revised her statement: she didn’t agree with apartheid “in principle” and it “could be left to resolve itself, guided by good-intentioned people of diverse ethnicities”. If Avril had been more attuned to her parent’s beliefs, or born in segregated America, she might have thought twice about apartheid. Yet her life had shielded her.

Heritage and Innocence

“I possess a English document,” she said, “and the government agents failed to question me about my background.” Therefore, with her “light” appearance (as described), she floated within European circles, buoyed up by their acclaim for her deceased parent. She gave a talk about her family’s work at the educational institution and conducted the broadcasting ensemble in the city, including the inspiring part of her concerto, subtitled: “In remembrance of my Father.” Although a skilled pianist herself, she never played as the featured artist in her piece. Rather, she consistently conducted as the maestro; and so the segregated ensemble played under her baton.

Avril hoped, in her own words, she “could introduce a change”. However, by that year, circumstances deteriorated. Once officials learned of her Black ancestry, she had to depart the nation. Her UK document offered no defense, the diplomatic official urged her to go or risk imprisonment. She went back to the UK, feeling great shame as the extent of her innocence dawned. “This experience was a difficult one,” she stated. Increasing her embarrassment was the printing that year of her controversial discussion, a year after her sudden departure from South Africa.

A Common Narrative

As I sat with these legacies, I perceived a recurring theme. The story of being British until it’s challenged – which recalls troops of color who served for the UK throughout the global conflict and lived only to be denied their due compensation. And the Windrush generation,